Papua New Guinea vs Uganda: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 524.92 t against 263.48 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 261.44 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 2.0 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uganda ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 67th and Uganda ranks 65th of 182 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.96 t | 157.05 t | 155.09 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 60.33 t | 450.4 t | 390.07 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 135.17 t | 582.58 t | 447.41 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Papua New Guinea or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 524.92 t against 263.48 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
- 261.44 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Uganda rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 67th and Uganda ranks 65th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf