South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- South Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 36,373 t against 23,290 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 13,083 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.6 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
South Africa ranks 36th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 170 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 147,594 t | 151,942 t | 4,348 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 32,611 t | 63,553 t | 30,943 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 14,950 t | 34,806 t | 19,857 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, South Africa or Uzbekistan?
- South Africa, at 36,373 t against 23,290 t in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between South Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 13,083 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do South Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- South Africa ranks 36th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf