Uzbekistan vs Viet Nam: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Uzbekistan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 29,357 t against 23,290 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 6,067 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.3 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Uzbekistan ranks 41st and Viet Nam ranks 39th of 182 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 151,942 t | 45,106 t | 106,836 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 62,516 t | 5,702 t | 56,814 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 43,549 t | 13,364 t | 30,185 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Uzbekistan or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 29,357 t against 23,290 t in Uzbekistan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Uzbekistan and Viet Nam?
- 6,067 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Viet Nam?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Uzbekistan and Viet Nam rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Uzbekistan ranks 41st and Viet Nam ranks 39th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf