Aruba vs Eswatini: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Aruba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.57 1000 USD against 0.45 1000 USD in Aruba, a difference of 0.12 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Eswatini ahead.
Aruba ranks 142nd and Eswatini ranks 139th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.59 1000 USD | 14.2 1000 USD | 6.61 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1.27 1000 USD | 3.82 1000 USD | 2.56 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.8 1000 USD | 0.4267 1000 USD | 1.37 1000 USD | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Aruba or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.57 1000 USD against 0.45 1000 USD in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Aruba and Eswatini?
- 0.12 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eswatini?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Eswatini rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Aruba ranks 142nd and Eswatini ranks 139th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf