Aruba vs Zambia: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Aruba
- Zambia
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.45 1000 USD against 0.35 1000 USD in Zambia, a difference of 0.1 1000 USD.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 151st and Zambia ranks 152nd of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.59 1000 USD | 5.82 1000 USD | 1.77 1000 USD | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.16 1000 USD | 29.67 1000 USD | 28.51 1000 USD | Zambia |
| 2020s | 2.52 1000 USD | 0.52 1000 USD | 2 1000 USD | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Aruba or Zambia?
- Aruba, at 0.45 1000 USD against 0.35 1000 USD in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Aruba and Zambia?
- 0.1 1000 USD, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Zambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Zambia rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Aruba ranks 151st and Zambia ranks 152nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf