Australia vs Lebanon: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Australia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 55,713 1000 USD against 51,862 1000 USD in Australia, a difference of 3,851 1000 USD.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 17th and Lebanon ranks 14th of 182 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71,096 1000 USD | 30,842 1000 USD | 40,254 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 51,037 1000 USD | 46,626 1000 USD | 4,412 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 54,827 1000 USD | 53,349 1000 USD | 1,478 1000 USD | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Australia or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 55,713 1000 USD against 51,862 1000 USD in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Australia and Lebanon?
- 3,851 1000 USD, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lebanon?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Lebanon rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Australia ranks 17th and Lebanon ranks 14th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf