Austria vs Côte d'Ivoire: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Austria
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Austria currently reports 34,286 1000 USD against 1,219 1000 USD in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 33,067 1000 USD.
That makes Austria's figure about 28.1 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 24th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th of 170 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,579 1000 USD | 747.13 1000 USD | 6,832 1000 USD | Austria |
| 2010s | 7,206 1000 USD | 1,475 1000 USD | 5,731 1000 USD | Austria |
| 2020s | 35,457 1000 USD | 1,334 1000 USD | 34,123 1000 USD | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Austria or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Austria, at 34,286 1000 USD against 1,219 1000 USD in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Austria and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 33,067 1000 USD, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Austria ranks 24th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf