Azerbaijan vs Eswatini: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Azerbaijan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0.6 1000 USD against 0.57 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 0.03 1000 USD.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 145th and Eswatini ranks 146th of 182 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.11 1000 USD | 15.43 1000 USD | 9.31 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 2.02 1000 USD | 5.78 1000 USD | 3.76 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.52 1000 USD | 38.47 1000 USD | 36.95 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Azerbaijan or Eswatini?
- Azerbaijan, at 0.6 1000 USD against 0.57 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Azerbaijan and Eswatini?
- 0.03 1000 USD, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Eswatini?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Eswatini rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 145th and Eswatini ranks 146th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf