Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Bahamas
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 33.61 1000 USD against 33.13 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.48 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Bahamas ranks 82nd and Costa Rica ranks 83rd of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.35 1000 USD | 1.3 1000 USD | 7.05 1000 USD | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 2.06 1000 USD | 34.11 1000 USD | 32.05 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 19.92 1000 USD | 70.39 1000 USD | 50.47 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Bahamas or Costa Rica?
- Bahamas, at 33.61 1000 USD against 33.13 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Bahamas and Costa Rica?
- 0.48 1000 USD, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Costa Rica?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Costa Rica rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Bahamas ranks 82nd and Costa Rica ranks 83rd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf