Bangladesh vs Uruguay: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Bangladesh
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 13,751 1000 USD against 10,614 1000 USD in Bangladesh, a difference of 3,137 1000 USD.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.3 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 31st of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,295 1000 USD | 7,984 1000 USD | 5,311 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 12,325 1000 USD | 12,334 1000 USD | 9.24 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 16,794 1000 USD | 13,960 1000 USD | 2,834 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Bangladesh or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 13,751 1000 USD against 10,614 1000 USD in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Bangladesh and Uruguay?
- 3,137 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Uruguay rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Bangladesh ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 31st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf