Belarus vs Colombia: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Colombia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 11,420 1000 USD against 7,226 1000 USD in Colombia, a difference of 4,194 1000 USD.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 32nd and Colombia ranks 35th of 182 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48,934 1000 USD | 12.83 1000 USD | 48,921 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 97,602 1000 USD | 2,119 1000 USD | 95,483 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 34,203 1000 USD | 9,192 1000 USD | 25,010 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Belarus or Colombia?
- Belarus, at 11,420 1000 USD against 7,226 1000 USD in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Belarus and Colombia?
- 4,194 1000 USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Colombia rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Belarus ranks 32nd and Colombia ranks 35th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf