Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 11,420 1000 USD against 7,329 1000 USD in Turkmenistan, a difference of 4,091 1000 USD.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 32nd and Turkmenistan ranks 34th of 182 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48,934 1000 USD | 2,156 1000 USD | 46,779 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 97,602 1000 USD | 4,090 1000 USD | 93,511 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 34,203 1000 USD | 6,008 1000 USD | 28,194 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Belarus or Turkmenistan?
- Belarus, at 11,420 1000 USD against 7,329 1000 USD in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Belarus and Turkmenistan?
- 4,091 1000 USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Turkmenistan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Turkmenistan rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Belarus ranks 32nd and Turkmenistan ranks 34th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf