Belarus vs Uruguay: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 13,751 1000 USD against 11,420 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 2,331 1000 USD.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 32nd and Uruguay ranks 31st of 182 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48,934 1000 USD | 7,984 1000 USD | 40,950 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 97,602 1000 USD | 12,334 1000 USD | 85,268 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 34,203 1000 USD | 13,960 1000 USD | 20,243 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 13,751 1000 USD against 11,420 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 2,331 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Belarus ranks 32nd and Uruguay ranks 31st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf