Belgium vs China, mainland: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Belgium
- China, mainland
How they compare
China, mainland currently reports 202,718 1000 USD against 201,226 1000 USD in Belgium, a difference of 1,492 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 3rd and China, mainland ranks 2nd of 182 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | China, mainland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 149,376 1000 USD | 747.82 1000 USD | 148,628 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 170,608 1000 USD | 4,059 1000 USD | 166,549 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 190,463 1000 USD | 73,195 1000 USD | 117,268 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Belgium or China, mainland?
- China, mainland, at 202,718 1000 USD against 201,226 1000 USD in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Belgium and China, mainland?
- 1,492 1000 USD, with China, mainland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and China, mainland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and China, mainland rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Belgium ranks 3rd and China, mainland ranks 2nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf