Burkina Faso vs Namibia: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Burkina Faso
- Namibia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 4.14 1000 USD against 3.42 1000 USD in Namibia, a difference of 0.72 1000 USD.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Namibia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 118th of 182 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.19 1000 USD | 32.11 1000 USD | 10.92 1000 USD | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.55 1000 USD | 48.34 1000 USD | 47.79 1000 USD | Namibia |
| 2020s | 3.3 1000 USD | 12.16 1000 USD | 8.86 1000 USD | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Burkina Faso or Namibia?
- Burkina Faso, at 4.14 1000 USD against 3.42 1000 USD in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Burkina Faso and Namibia?
- 0.72 1000 USD, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Namibia rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Burkina Faso ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 118th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf