Canada vs Luxembourg: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Canada
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Canada currently reports 17 1000 USD against 15.85 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.15 1000 USD.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 97th and Luxembourg ranks 99th of 182 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,906 1000 USD | 9.02 1000 USD | 3,897 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2010s | 34,569 1000 USD | 19.05 1000 USD | 34,550 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2020s | 123.82 1000 USD | 11.46 1000 USD | 112.36 1000 USD | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Canada or Luxembourg?
- Canada, at 17 1000 USD against 15.85 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Canada and Luxembourg?
- 1.15 1000 USD, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Luxembourg rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Canada ranks 97th and Luxembourg ranks 99th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf