Chile vs El Salvador: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
Chile currently reports 996.35 1000 USD against 496.55 1000 USD in El Salvador, a difference of 499.8 1000 USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 2.0 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 48th and El Salvador ranks 51st of 182 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 640.5 1000 USD | 2.96 1000 USD | 637.55 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 1,779 1000 USD | 621.25 1000 USD | 1,158 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2020s | 1,919 1000 USD | 991.76 1000 USD | 927.21 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Chile or El Salvador?
- Chile, at 996.35 1000 USD against 496.55 1000 USD in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Chile and El Salvador?
- 499.8 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Chile ranks 48th and El Salvador ranks 51st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf