Congo vs Jamaica: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Congo
- Jamaica
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.03 1000 USD against 0.02 1000 USD in Jamaica, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Jamaica ahead.
Congo ranks 175th and Jamaica ranks 177th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.65 1000 USD | 20.82 1000 USD | 19.18 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 5.39 1000 USD | 3.91 1000 USD | 1.48 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.03 1000 USD | 0.02 1000 USD | 0.01 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Congo or Jamaica?
- Congo, at 0.03 1000 USD against 0.02 1000 USD in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Congo and Jamaica?
- 0.01 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Jamaica?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Jamaica rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Congo ranks 175th and Jamaica ranks 177th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf