Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Congo
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.03 1000 USD against 0.03 1000 USD in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Congo ranks 175th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 175th of 182 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.65 1000 USD | 0.065 1000 USD | 1.58 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2010s | 7.22 1000 USD | 0.085 1000 USD | 7.14 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Congo or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Congo, at 0.03 1000 USD against 0.03 1000 USD in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Congo ranks 175th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 175th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf