Denmark vs Nicaragua: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Denmark
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 106.32 1000 USD against 100.75 1000 USD in Denmark, a difference of 5.57 1000 USD.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 72nd and Nicaragua ranks 69th of 182 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,451 1000 USD | 0.1025 1000 USD | 2,450 1000 USD | Denmark |
| 2010s | 333.48 1000 USD | 22.13 1000 USD | 311.35 1000 USD | Denmark |
| 2020s | 470.92 1000 USD | 63.35 1000 USD | 407.57 1000 USD | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Denmark or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 106.32 1000 USD against 100.75 1000 USD in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Denmark and Nicaragua?
- 5.57 1000 USD, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Nicaragua?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Nicaragua rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Denmark ranks 72nd and Nicaragua ranks 69th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf