Ecuador vs Gambia: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Gambia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 110.88 1000 USD against 102.42 1000 USD in Gambia, a difference of 8.46 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 68th and Gambia ranks 70th of 182 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 184.74 1000 USD | 7.8 1000 USD | 176.94 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 331.32 1000 USD | 0.25 1000 USD | 331.07 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 102.52 1000 USD | 40.98 1000 USD | 61.54 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Ecuador or Gambia?
- Ecuador, at 110.88 1000 USD against 102.42 1000 USD in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Ecuador and Gambia?
- 8.46 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Gambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Gambia rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 68th and Gambia ranks 70th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf