Egypt vs Guatemala: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Egypt
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 328.29 1000 USD against 274.13 1000 USD in Egypt, a difference of 54.16 1000 USD.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 56th and Guatemala ranks 55th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 171.37 1000 USD | 52.47 1000 USD | 118.9 1000 USD | Egypt |
| 2010s | 58.45 1000 USD | 63.79 1000 USD | 5.34 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 105.43 1000 USD | 149.24 1000 USD | 43.81 1000 USD | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Egypt or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 328.29 1000 USD against 274.13 1000 USD in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Egypt and Guatemala?
- 54.16 1000 USD, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Guatemala?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Guatemala rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Egypt ranks 56th and Guatemala ranks 55th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf