El Salvador vs Guyana: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- El Salvador
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 702.53 1000 USD against 496.55 1000 USD in El Salvador, a difference of 205.98 1000 USD.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.4 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 51st and Guyana ranks 50th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Guyana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.22 1000 USD | 2.29 1000 USD | 0.075 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 698.89 1000 USD | 107.02 1000 USD | 591.88 1000 USD | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 991.76 1000 USD | 757.25 1000 USD | 234.5 1000 USD | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, El Salvador or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 702.53 1000 USD against 496.55 1000 USD in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between El Salvador and Guyana?
- 205.98 1000 USD, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guyana?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Guyana rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- El Salvador ranks 51st and Guyana ranks 50th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf