El Salvador vs Romania: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- El Salvador
- Romania
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 496.55 1000 USD against 439.77 1000 USD in Romania, a difference of 56.78 1000 USD.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Romania ahead.
El Salvador ranks 51st and Romania ranks 53rd of 182 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.96 1000 USD | 15,585 1000 USD | 15,582 1000 USD | Romania |
| 2010s | 621.25 1000 USD | 23,012 1000 USD | 22,391 1000 USD | Romania |
| 2020s | 991.76 1000 USD | 3,311 1000 USD | 2,320 1000 USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, El Salvador or Romania?
- El Salvador, at 496.55 1000 USD against 439.77 1000 USD in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between El Salvador and Romania?
- 56.78 1000 USD, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Romania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Romania rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- El Salvador ranks 51st and Romania ranks 53rd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf