Eswatini vs Kazakhstan: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.67 1000 USD against 0.57 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1 1000 USD.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 146th and Kazakhstan ranks 143rd of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.44 1000 USD | 14.19 1000 USD | 0.2512 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 5.41 1000 USD | 35.56 1000 USD | 30.15 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.355 1000 USD | 0.415 1000 USD | 0.06 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Eswatini or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.67 1000 USD against 0.57 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2021.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Eswatini and Kazakhstan?
- 0.1 1000 USD, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kazakhstan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Eswatini and Kazakhstan rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 146th and Kazakhstan ranks 143rd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf