Eswatini vs Montenegro: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Montenegro
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.57 1000 USD against 0.48 1000 USD in Montenegro, a difference of 0.09 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 139th and Montenegro ranks 141st of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.64 1000 USD | 9.29 1000 USD | 5.35 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 5.38 1000 USD | 1.17 1000 USD | 4.21 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.4267 1000 USD | 1.35 1000 USD | 0.92 1000 USD | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Eswatini or Montenegro?
- Eswatini, at 0.57 1000 USD against 0.48 1000 USD in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Eswatini and Montenegro?
- 0.09 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Montenegro rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 139th and Montenegro ranks 141st of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf