Finland vs Seychelles: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Finland
- Seychelles
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.13 1000 USD against 0.09 1000 USD in Seychelles, a difference of 0.04 1000 USD.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 167th and Seychelles ranks 168th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,069 1000 USD | 12.69 1000 USD | 5,057 1000 USD | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.8175 1000 USD | 1.05 1000 USD | 0.2375 1000 USD | Seychelles |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD | 0.09 1000 USD | 0.09 1000 USD | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Finland or Seychelles?
- Finland, at 0.13 1000 USD against 0.09 1000 USD in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Finland and Seychelles?
- 0.04 1000 USD, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Seychelles?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Finland and Seychelles rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Finland ranks 167th and Seychelles ranks 168th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf