Georgia vs Slovenia: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Georgia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 193.4 1000 USD against 147.54 1000 USD in Slovenia, a difference of 45.86 1000 USD.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 61st and Slovenia ranks 64th of 182 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.49 1000 USD | 16.74 1000 USD | 9.25 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 1.47 1000 USD | 75.91 1000 USD | 74.44 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 68.12 1000 USD | 210.51 1000 USD | 142.39 1000 USD | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Georgia or Slovenia?
- Georgia, at 193.4 1000 USD against 147.54 1000 USD in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Georgia and Slovenia?
- 45.86 1000 USD, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Slovenia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Slovenia rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Georgia ranks 61st and Slovenia ranks 64th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf