Honduras vs Sri Lanka: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Honduras
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 1.9 1000 USD against 1.5 1000 USD in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.4 1000 USD.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.3 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Honduras ranks 130th and Sri Lanka ranks 132nd of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110.5 1000 USD | 175.77 1000 USD | 65.27 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 14.26 1000 USD | 2.54 1000 USD | 11.71 1000 USD | Honduras |
| 2020s | 0.98 1000 USD | 2.83 1000 USD | 1.85 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Honduras or Sri Lanka?
- Honduras, at 1.9 1000 USD against 1.5 1000 USD in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Honduras and Sri Lanka?
- 0.4 1000 USD, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Sri Lanka?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Honduras and Sri Lanka rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Honduras ranks 130th and Sri Lanka ranks 132nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf