Iceland vs Seychelles: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Iceland
- Seychelles
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.14 1000 USD against 0.09 1000 USD in Seychelles, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.6 times Seychelles's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 165th and Seychelles ranks 168th of 182 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.42 1000 USD | 9.24 1000 USD | 10.18 1000 USD | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1.75 1000 USD | 0.864 1000 USD | 0.888 1000 USD | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.23 1000 USD | 0.09 1000 USD | 0.14 1000 USD | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Iceland or Seychelles?
- Iceland, at 0.14 1000 USD against 0.09 1000 USD in Seychelles as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Iceland and Seychelles?
- 0.05 1000 USD, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Seychelles?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Seychelles rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Iceland ranks 165th and Seychelles ranks 168th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf