Japan vs New Zealand: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Japan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 81,618 1000 USD against 53,848 1000 USD in Japan, a difference of 27,770 1000 USD.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 12th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 128,375 1000 USD | 107,922 1000 USD | 20,453 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 71,174 1000 USD | 111,449 1000 USD | 40,274 1000 USD | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 42,217 1000 USD | 108,024 1000 USD | 65,807 1000 USD | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Japan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 81,618 1000 USD against 53,848 1000 USD in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Japan and New Zealand?
- 27,770 1000 USD, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and New Zealand?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Japan and New Zealand rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Japan ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 12th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf