Kazakhstan vs Mauritius: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.7 1000 USD against 0.67 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.03 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 143rd and Mauritius ranks 142nd of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.19 1000 USD | 2.68 1000 USD | 11.52 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 35.56 1000 USD | 3.97 1000 USD | 31.59 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.415 1000 USD | 1.82 1000 USD | 1.4 1000 USD | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Kazakhstan or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.7 1000 USD against 0.67 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
- 0.03 1000 USD, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mauritius rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 143rd and Mauritius ranks 142nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf