Kazakhstan vs Saint Lucia: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 0.92 1000 USD against 0.67 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.25 1000 USD.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.4 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 143rd and Saint Lucia ranks 140th of 182 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.9 1000 USD | 2.57 1000 USD | 30.33 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 41.92 1000 USD | 0.3667 1000 USD | 41.56 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Kazakhstan or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 0.92 1000 USD against 0.67 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Kazakhstan and Saint Lucia?
- 0.25 1000 USD, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Saint Lucia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Saint Lucia rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 143rd and Saint Lucia ranks 140th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf