Kyrgyzstan vs Mauritius: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.97 1000 USD against 0.7 1000 USD in Mauritius, a difference of 0.27 1000 USD.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 142nd of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.8 1000 USD | 1.52 1000 USD | 5.28 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.17 1000 USD | 6.4 1000 USD | 6.23 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2.04 1000 USD | 1.26 1000 USD | 0.78 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Kyrgyzstan or Mauritius?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.97 1000 USD against 0.7 1000 USD in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 0.27 1000 USD, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 142nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf