Latvia vs Sweden: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Latvia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 218.59 1000 USD against 190.74 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 27.85 1000 USD.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sweden ahead.
Latvia ranks 62nd and Sweden ranks 59th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 223.01 1000 USD | 792.81 1000 USD | 569.81 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2010s | 253.79 1000 USD | 445.82 1000 USD | 192.03 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2020s | 319.44 1000 USD | 275.78 1000 USD | 43.67 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Latvia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 218.59 1000 USD against 190.74 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Latvia and Sweden?
- 27.85 1000 USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Latvia ranks 62nd and Sweden ranks 59th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf