Libya vs Singapore: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Libya
- Singapore
How they compare
Libya currently reports 71.45 1000 USD against 58.14 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 13.31 1000 USD.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Libya ranks 75th and Singapore ranks 77th of 182 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.92 1000 USD | 60.01 1000 USD | 8.09 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2010s | 33.77 1000 USD | 109.09 1000 USD | 75.32 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2020s | 37.23 1000 USD | 168.65 1000 USD | 131.43 1000 USD | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Libya or Singapore?
- Libya, at 71.45 1000 USD against 58.14 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2022.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Libya and Singapore?
- 13.31 1000 USD, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Libya and Singapore rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Libya ranks 75th and Singapore ranks 77th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf