Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Malawi
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 44.99 1000 USD against 41 1000 USD in Malawi, a difference of 3.99 1000 USD.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 81st and Papua New Guinea ranks 79th of 182 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.87 1000 USD | 5.1 1000 USD | 2.23 1000 USD | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 35.88 1000 USD | 5.53 1000 USD | 30.35 1000 USD | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Malawi or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 44.99 1000 USD against 41 1000 USD in Malawi as of 2022.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
- 3.99 1000 USD, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do Malawi and Papua New Guinea rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Malawi ranks 81st and Papua New Guinea ranks 79th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf