Montenegro vs Zambia: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Montenegro
- Zambia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.48 1000 USD against 0.35 1000 USD in Zambia, a difference of 0.13 1000 USD.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Zambia ahead.
Montenegro ranks 141st and Zambia ranks 143rd of 170 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.29 1000 USD | 29.15 1000 USD | 19.85 1000 USD | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1.63 1000 USD | 30.29 1000 USD | 28.66 1000 USD | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.13 1000 USD | 0.52 1000 USD | 0.39 1000 USD | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Montenegro or Zambia?
- Montenegro, at 0.48 1000 USD against 0.35 1000 USD in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Montenegro and Zambia?
- 0.13 1000 USD, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Zambia rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Montenegro ranks 141st and Zambia ranks 143rd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf