Peru vs South Africa: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 40,224 1000 USD against 6,184 1000 USD in South Africa, a difference of 34,040 1000 USD.
That makes Peru's figure about 6.5 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 22nd of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,069 1000 USD | 15,657 1000 USD | 6,588 1000 USD | South Africa |
| 2010s | 20,450 1000 USD | 3,543 1000 USD | 16,907 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2020s | 39,380 1000 USD | 2,261 1000 USD | 37,119 1000 USD | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 40,224 1000 USD against 6,184 1000 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Peru and South Africa?
- 34,040 1000 USD, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Peru ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 22nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf