Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1.5 1000 USD against 1.17 1000 USD in Rwanda, a difference of 0.33 1000 USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Rwanda ranks 129th and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.51 1000 USD | 212.17 1000 USD | 207.66 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 4.9 1000 USD | 3.02 1000 USD | 1.88 1000 USD | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 1.17 1000 USD | 4.15 1000 USD | 2.98 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 1.5 1000 USD against 1.17 1000 USD in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 0.33 1000 USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Rwanda ranks 129th and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf