Tunisia vs Uzbekistan: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Tunisia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1,328 1000 USD against 1,050 1000 USD in Tunisia, a difference of 278 1000 USD.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.3 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Tunisia ranks 47th and Uzbekistan ranks 45th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.72 1000 USD | 2,423 1000 USD | 2,419 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 94.98 1000 USD | 3,503 1000 USD | 3,408 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 5,855 1000 USD | 2,877 1000 USD | 2,979 1000 USD | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Tunisia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 1,328 1000 USD against 1,050 1000 USD in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Tunisia and Uzbekistan?
- 278 1000 USD, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Uzbekistan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Tunisia and Uzbekistan rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Tunisia ranks 47th and Uzbekistan ranks 45th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf