Turkmenistan vs Uruguay: Phosphate rock — Import value
Phosphate rock — Import value over time
- Turkmenistan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 13,751 1000 USD against 7,329 1000 USD in Turkmenistan, a difference of 6,422 1000 USD.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.9 times Turkmenistan's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Turkmenistan ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 31st of 182 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turkmenistan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,156 1000 USD | 7,984 1000 USD | 5,829 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 4,090 1000 USD | 12,334 1000 USD | 8,244 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 6,008 1000 USD | 13,960 1000 USD | 7,951 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import value, Turkmenistan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 13,751 1000 USD against 7,329 1000 USD in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import value between Turkmenistan and Uruguay?
- 6,422 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Turkmenistan and Uruguay rank globally for phosphate rock — import value?
- Turkmenistan ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 31st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf