Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Uruguay: PK compounds — Agricultural Use
PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 248 t against 95 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 153 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 2.6 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 64 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.67 t | 454 t | 374.33 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 298.5 t | 663.5 t | 365 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 248 t against 95 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uruguay?
- 153 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2011.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uruguay rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 64 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf