Chile vs Norway: PK compounds — Agricultural Use

Chile
343 t
in 2016
Norway
532 t
in 2024
Chile rank
26th
Norway rank
23rd

PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Chile
  • Norway
01.0k2.0k3.0k200720152024

How they compare

Norway currently reports 532 t against 343 t in Chile, a difference of 189 t.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.6 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 26th and Norway ranks 23rd of 69 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 1,792 t 593.5 t 1,198 t Chile
2010s 520.43 t 284.86 t 235.57 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Chile or Norway?
Norway, at 532 t against 343 t in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Chile and Norway?
189 t, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Norway?
9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2016.
How do Chile and Norway rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
Chile ranks 26th and Norway ranks 23rd of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 705 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf