Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Paraguay: PK compounds — Agricultural Use
PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 124,704 t against 8 t in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 124,696 t.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and Paraguay ranks 4th of 4 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26 t | 186,948 t | 186,922 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 7 t | 140,515 t | 140,508 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 124,704 t against 8 t in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Paraguay?
- 124,696 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Paraguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2011.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Paraguay rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and Paraguay ranks 4th of 4 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf