Ecuador vs Greece: PK compounds — Agricultural Use

Ecuador
747 t
in 2023
Greece
901 t
in 2011
Ecuador rank
21st
Greece rank
19th

PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Ecuador
  • Greece
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200220122023

How they compare

Greece currently reports 901 t against 747 t in Ecuador, a difference of 154 t.

That makes Greece's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 21st and Greece ranks 19th of 69 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Greece Difference Ahead
2000s 128 t 1,095 t 966.67 t Greece
2010s 128 t 1,810 t 1,682 t Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Ecuador or Greece?
Greece, at 901 t against 747 t in Ecuador as of 2011.
What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Ecuador and Greece?
154 t, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Greece?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Ecuador and Greece rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
Ecuador ranks 21st and Greece ranks 19th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 705 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf