Estonia vs Namibia: PK compounds — Agricultural Use

Estonia
38 t
in 2011
Namibia
52 t
in 2010
Estonia rank
47th
Namibia rank
44th

PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Estonia
  • Namibia
05001.0k1.5k200220062011

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 52 t against 38 t in Estonia, a difference of 14 t.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Estonia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 47th and Namibia ranks 44th of 69 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 739.25 t 73.75 t 665.5 t Estonia
2010s 54 t 52 t 2 t Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Estonia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 52 t against 38 t in Estonia as of 2010.
What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Estonia and Namibia?
14 t, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Namibia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
How do Estonia and Namibia rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
Estonia ranks 47th and Namibia ranks 44th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 705 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf