Fiji vs Panama: PK compounds — Agricultural Use

Fiji
27 t
in 2011
Panama
19 t
in 2021
Fiji rank
50th
Panama rank
52nd

PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Fiji
  • Panama
050100150200200220112021

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 27 t against 19 t in Panama, a difference of 8 t.

That makes Fiji's figure about 1.4 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 50th and Panama ranks 52nd of 69 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 58.5 t 83 t 24.5 t Panama
2010s 19.5 t 173 t 153.5 t Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Fiji or Panama?
Fiji, at 27 t against 19 t in Panama as of 2011.
What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Fiji and Panama?
8 t, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Panama?
6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Fiji and Panama rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
Fiji ranks 50th and Panama ranks 52nd of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 705 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf