Guatemala vs Uganda: PK compounds — Agricultural Use

Guatemala
341 t
in 2011
Uganda
370 t
in 2011
Guatemala rank
27th
Uganda rank
25th

PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Guatemala
  • Uganda
0200400600800200220062011

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 370 t against 341 t in Guatemala, a difference of 29 t.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uganda ahead.

Guatemala ranks 27th and Uganda ranks 25th of 69 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 32.33 t 245.67 t 213.33 t Uganda
2010s 547.5 t 219.5 t 328 t Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Guatemala or Uganda?
Uganda, at 370 t against 341 t in Guatemala as of 2011.
What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Guatemala and Uganda?
29 t, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uganda?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Guatemala and Uganda rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
Guatemala ranks 27th and Uganda ranks 25th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 705 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf