Luxembourg vs Oman: PK compounds — Agricultural Use

Luxembourg
0 t
in 2024
Oman
0 t
in 2022
Luxembourg rank
60th
Oman rank
60th

PK compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Oman
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200220132024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Oman, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Oman ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 60th and Oman ranks 60th of 69 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Oman Difference Ahead
2000s 725 t 757 t 32 t Oman
2010s 805 t 214.5 t 590.5 t Luxembourg
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pk compounds — agricultural use, Luxembourg or Oman?
Luxembourg, at 0 t against 0 t in Oman as of 2024.
What is the difference in pk compounds — agricultural use between Luxembourg and Oman?
0 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Oman?
6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Luxembourg and Oman rank globally for pk compounds — agricultural use?
Luxembourg ranks 60th and Oman ranks 60th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as PK compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PK compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 705 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf